This
article is mainly about how people communicate and interact with individual
computer interfaces. The author puts the reader in a position to evaluate
how computer interaction changes when the computer programmer begins to look at
how the user and computer communicate rather than just what a computer should
do or display.
The
author compares theater and psychology at first. Showing the reader how similar the two
disciplines are just with a different goal in the end. At first I would have never thought to
compare the two, nor would I have reason to.
But, the chapter highlights their similarities in an effort to warm you
up to the next comparison between theater and computer programming. How could theater, which has been around
since the Greeks have anything to do with a technological object that could
still be considered relatively new? At
first I thought it couldn’t, but the more I read the more I understand what the
author was trying to say.
How
people see things can affect how they do things. A boring computer set up yields forth no
creativity or excitement. When an
interesting, appealing interface catches some ones’ eye they are more drawn to
it, more likely to use it and create a better product.
How
people interact is also a large art of this chapter. Looking at how humans communicate with each
other can be studied and applied to computers and programming. People like something familiar and within
their comfort zone and at the time computer companies were still trying to
figure out how to market the computer, it was neither. When an interface or new product can be
related to by people they are more likely to grasp the idea, which is exactly
what programmers are trying to do. By
including the consumer in mind while programming new interfaces, the consumer
feels they have helped create something for themselves and can appreciate it.
This
chapter makes you look at how simple things one normally wouldn’t look into can
be considered an art as grand as theater.
Not everything artistic happens within a canvas and paint nor does it
need to be traditional in any way, shape or form. Art can be within something as unexpected as
an interface and should be acknowledged and appreciated as such.
No comments:
Post a Comment