I have
always been interested in photography, so when I stared reading Cory Arcangel’s
article, “On Compression”, I was drawn to understand the process that goes into
compressing information, especially images. I have worked with JPEGs before,
but never actually knew what it stood for, Joint Photographic Experts Group,
and what it meant to save a picture as a JPEG.
He did a
really nice job of explaining the process of compressing information through
either Lossy or Lossless. His example of Lossless, saying that it is all the
same information just saved in a more efficient way is really interesting.
Instead of having ‘a a a a a a a a a b a’, it is just, nine ‘a’s’, one ‘b’, and
one ‘a’, so all the information is there, but just simpler. To further explain
Lossless, he says that this is what a zip file does when it is opened, it takes
what is compressed and then reads it as the original version. When reading this
example I immediately thought that this is what was used for images because I did
not think there was any way an image or video could be missing information to
be recognizable. When he proceeded to say that “believe it or not, our eyes and
ears are pretty crap, and we don’t usually notice missing bits here and there”
(Arcangel 221), I was not too convinced. But with his example explaining how
instead of the nine ‘a’s’, one ‘b’, and one ‘a’, a compressed image would just
be 11 ‘a’s’ it started to make sense, that our mind fills in the blanks and we
generalize the images that we see, so a blurry or pixelated image is still
recognizable.
Looking
into the mathematics of DCT formula, it amazes me of how people even think of
these things! The equations are so complex and when he describes the different
cosine frequencies, it gets a little confusing. What I find amazing is the fact
that the pixelated version of the picture is only “the first few low frequency
basis functions of an 8 x 8 2D DCT” (227). It makes me wonder what I lot of
high frequency basis functions of a DCT would look like. Either way, this
article has been very helpful with explaining some common computer vocabulary
that I never really took into account. It was interesting to read and makes me
wonder what images will look like in the future once compression has become
even more revised.
No comments:
Post a Comment